4th Annual Summer Workshop

held as part of the

NDIA Intelligent Vehicles Symposium

 

Abstracts and Presentations

Date

Time

Presenter

Institution

Title

 

 

June 16

0800-1200

Dr. John Miller

J-N-J Miller, PLC

Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions: Exploring the electronic-CVT

abstract

presentation

June 16

0800-1200

Dr. Johann Borenstein

University of Michigan Ann-Arbor 

Mobile Robot Navigation on Rugged and Really Rugged Terrain

abstract

presentation

June 16

1300-1700

Dr. Fatma Mili

Oakland University

Task-Centered Performance Analysis and Modeling

abstract

presentation

June 16

1300-1700

Dr. Alberto Lacaze

Robotics Research Tactically Aware Obstacle Avoidance and  Path Planning

abstract

presentation

 

Mobile Robot Navigation on Rugged and Really Rugged Terrain
0800 - 1200, June 16
Professor Johann Borenstein, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

This workshop presents select topics of mobile robotics research,  presented in two distinct parts:

I.  No GPS? No Problem!

This talk addresses the problem of navigation on rugged, off-road terrain. After briefly addressing issues of obstacle avoidance on 3-D terrain, the talk focuses most of its attention on mobile robot position estimation in the absence of GPS. Unique University of Michigan-developed methods for inertial navigation and for detecting and correcting wheel slippage are presented. These methods were originally developed for the Mars Rover 2009 mission, but they are applicable to terrestrial dead-reckoning enhancements, as well. The talk concludes with unique observations from the ultimate test for off-road mobile robots: The DARPA Grand Challenge 2004.

II. Serpentine Robots - a Can of Worms with Great Promise

This talk introduces the relatively new breed of serpentine mobile robots. Serpentine robots, also called Worm or Snake Robots, are elongated, multi-segmented vehicles that promise to offer unprecedented mobility on extremely rugged terrain. The talk reviews earlier work in this area, and then focuses on one state-of-the-art serpentine robot, called "OmniTread." The OmniTread is described in detail and provides the examples for a more in-depth discussion of serpentine robots,their abilities, and their unique problems.

Back

 

 

Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions: Exploring the electronic-CVT
0800 - 1200, June 16
Dr. John Miller, J-N-J Miller, PLC

Abstract – Gasoline and diesel electric hybrid propulsion technologies, regardless of the source OEM, have selected the twin electric machine power split configuration, known as electronic- CVT as the hybrid transmission of choice.  Early development of the e-CVT occurred when Toyota undertook its project G21 in the mid-1990’s and then showcased the Prius concept vehicle at the 1995 Tokoyo Auto Show that the electronic-CVT became reality.  In their quest for an economical and fuel efficient global vehicle for the 21st century, Toyota Motor Corp. had its engineers focus on power train architectures that would more than halve the CO2 emissions of conventional gasoline power plant vehicles.  Toyota is now in their second generation of Toyota Hybrid System, THS, hybrid propulsion system technology.  The Ford Motor Company released its version of the e-CVT during the Fall of 2004 as the Escape SUV hybrid.  The Ford Hybrid System, FHS, is an outgrowth of earlier developments at the Volvo Car Company in conjunction with Aisin-AW, a transmission subsidiary of the Toyota Motor Co.  As an e-CVT, the FHS system is a variant of the original THS-I power split with dual electric machines. General Motors has independently developed a new type of power split referred to as their Advanced Hybrid System-2 mode, or AHS-2, used in hybrid bus propulsion by Allison for full size SUV applications.  The AHS-2 system realizes the input split character of the Toyota THS and Ford systems in its Mode 1 configuration with extension to compound split in Mode 2 configuration.  Transition between Mode 1, or low range for city driving, to Mode 2, or high range for highway driving and towing, is accomplished during a synchronous shift at the mechanical nodes of the system.  In this seminar the two main branches of power split architecture will be discussed in depth using models and simulation.

Task-Centered Performance Analysis and Modeling
Professor Fatma Mili ,   Oakland University
1300 - 1700, June 16

The state of the art in performance modeling is currently tightly bound to a specific task-agent assignment. In other words, given a system under design such as a vehicle (e.g. airplane), given a task under consideration (e.g. piloting), the analysis of performance of this task starts once the task has been assigned to agents (e.g. one human pilot). Performance models of the piloting task are then developed around the constraints and assumptions of human cognitive, perceptual, and motor architecture. This approach is suboptimal because the assignment of tasks to agents is one of the key parameters in design. Questions such as “how many people are needed to are best performance?” and “Which agent would perform better on this task?” are important design questions.  Answering these questions is cumbersome and time consuming with the current approaches to performance modeling. In this presentation, we will describe a joint project whose goal is (i) to support reasoning about performance in general, independently of the agent(s) performing the task, and (ii) to support the assignment of agents to tasks.  The approach is task-centered: An OWL-S ontology is used to describe tasks and document their needs in terms of resources. The resource consumption of a task can be given as an estimate, or computed from the structure and the components of the task. We describe the reasoning capability added to OWL-S to ensure that the ontology is consistent ant to allow the resource consumption values to be progressively refined as tasks are described in more detail.

Back

 

 

 

Tactically Aware Obstacle Avoidance and  Path Planning 
Alberto Lacaze, Robotics Research
1300 - 1700, June 16

Several advance technology areas for ground robotic need to be resolved for the success of the Autonomous Navigation System (ANS). This tutorial will address four of these topics.

1)      Moving obstacle detection from moving platform.  Many algorithms that perform moving obstacle detection from a static platform find their applicability in sentry operations. However, the algorithms needed for moving obstacle detection and tracking from a moving platform are different in principle.  Moving obstacle detection from a moving platform is an unavoidable requirement for ANS. Some candidate systems will be presented.

2)      Implementing tactically aware obstacles avoidance and path planning.  Tactics have been treated as a high level skill that does not involve
obstacles avoidance and path planning. This assumption creates systems that may be tactically aware in the long range plans; however, short
range behaviors are strongly influenced by the terrain (avoiding ditches and vegetation). A system for integrating tactical behaviors and
obstacle avoidance will be presented together with the latest results of the adaptable tactical behaviors competition.

3)      Feature registration of the Leader-Follower operations.  Realistic scenarios for leader-follower operations will include GPS
shadows and INS (Inertial Navigation System) drift. On the other hand,  high speed leader-follower requirements under the ANS create restrictive
following error requirements. This presentation will concentrate on a visual odometry techniques designed to meet these requirements. Aerial
ground-to-ground registration as well as air-to-ground registration will  be addressed.

4)      Hardware acceleration for high speed obstacle avoidance.  In the past, stereo-based perception for ground autonomous vehicle was
the long pole in the tent of computational complexity. The shift in  popularity from stereo vision to LADAR-based systems as well as the
increased speed requirements for autonomous robots are focusing the  attention to the complexity of behavior generation. A methodology for
bringing hardware acceleration to the obstacle avoidance problem will be  presented. 

Back